Constitution vs. Articles of Confederation

M. S. 226 Syed Faridi 701 3/16/13 Constitution Vs. The Articles of Confederation were the first off brass policy for the United States of the States and were in place from 1781-1789. However it is governing power was extremely doed. There were some(prenominal) differences in the midst of the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. At the finis of the American Revolution the free states requisite some sort of control that would collapse to a unified country. Issues arose such as How should power be divided between local and bailiwick regimes? How should laws be made, and by whom?Who should be authorized to govern those laws? How could the disposal be designed to protect the inalienable individual rights? Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a tribulation for the most part, but non completely. by and by the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to rewrite the articles, but instead, constructed the Con stitution. There were so numerous changes made and very little remained the same. The states act to limit the power of the national government because they feared that it would move a monarchy.In an effort to limit the power of the national government, Congress created unity without enough power to govern effectively, which light-emitting diode to serious national and international problems. adept of the main weaknesses under the Articles of Confederation was its incapableness to regulate trade and levy taxes. The states controlled every last(predicate) of their cash flows. Sometimes, the states were in debt because of tariff wars that they would pack in with one another. Because of these debts, the states refused to give the national government the money it need.Hence, the government could not afford off the debts it had gained during the revolution, including paying soldiers who had fought in the war and citizens who had provided supplies to the cause. Congress could not devote needed measures because they lacked the nine-state majority required to become laws and couldnt amend articles because unanimous harmonize of the entirely states was required. The states largely ignored Congress, which was feeble to enforce cooperation, and it was therefore unable to run out its duties.The national government could not force the states to adhere to the terms of the treaty of Paris of 1783 ending the American Revolution. impertinent countries saw lack of unity in states. Because of the lack of income the national government collected, the spic-and-span-fangled nation was unable to defend its borders from British and Spanish abuse because it could not pay for an army when the states would not contribute the demand funds. The country would not get bounteous as a whole because states controlled all interstate commerce.States coined their own money and decorate its supply, so values of currency varied from state to state. In conclusion, In 1781 Amer ican colonists took hold to the Articles of Confederation, their first outline of democracy. The Articles set up a good bag for government, but it was soon realized that it needed a lot of work. In Philadelphia a group of the most well improve and experienced men of America met to revisal the Articles of Confederation. The result of this meeting was not a revised Articles of Confederation, but a new document that outlined the government we digest today. This was the Constitution.